Module delete dispatchers do not enforce kernel-object ownership before irreversible deletion
A ThreadX module reaches a kernel object's delete service through the Module Manager's dispatch layer, which asked one question about the pointer: does the object lie outside the module's own code and data. That is the policy for *using* an object, and using an object a module does not own is supported and intended — `txm_module_object_pointer_get_extended` searches the system's created objects by name and hands back objects the application created and objects other modules created, so that a module can send to a shared queue, take a shared semaphore or get a shared mutex. Destroying one of those is not sharing it. A module could name any object it had a pointer to and have the privileged dispatcher delete it.
CVE-2026-94023
Primary source · Revision 1
Imported from structured advisory data. Source references identify upstream records or fields; verify affected versions and your deployed configuration.
Security context
Source reference: cve:CVE-2026-94023
Eclipse ThreadX
Source reference: /containers/cna/affected/0/product
- Affected versions
- Not stated in this record
- Fixed versions
- Not stated in this record
- Prerequisites
- Not stated in this record
Structured affected-version data
Original package identities and version rules from this source.
[
{
"vendor": "Eclipse Foundation",
"product": "Eclipse ThreadX",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0.1",
"versionType": "semver",
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.1.202602a"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.2.202603"
}
],
"packageName": "ThreadX",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected"
}
]- Related CVEs
- CVE-2026-94023
Source reference:
/cveMetadata/cveId
Publisher severity
medium
Source reference: /containers/cna/metrics
- Event
- #42406 · Revision 1
- Added to Heist Feed
- Publisher date