wger: Trainer Privilege Escalation - Improper Privilege Management
### Summary A user with only the `gym_trainer` permission can deactivate any account in the same gym, including `gym_manager` and `general_gym_manager` accounts. The `UserDeactivateView` grants access to anyone holding **any one** of `gym.manage_gym`, `gym.manage_gyms`, or `gym.gym_trainer` (OR logic via `WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin`), and performs no privilege-hierarchy check to prevent a lower-privileged role from disabling a higher-privileged one. ### Details `UserDeactivateView` (file: `wger/core/views/user.py`, line 378) is configured with: ```python permission_required = ('gym.manage_gym', 'gym.manage_gyms', 'gym.gym_trainer') ``` `WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin` (file: `wger/utils/generic_views.py`, line 48) treats this tuple as an OR check -- any single permission is sufficient: ```python class WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin(PermissionRequiredMixin): def has_permission(self): for permission in self.get_permission_required(): if self.request.user.has_perm(permission): return True # <-- ANY one permission is enough return False ``` The `dispatch()` method only verifies same-gym membership: ```python def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs): edit_user = get_object_or_404(User, pk=self.kwargs['pk']) if ( request.user.has_perm('gym.manage_gym') or request.user.has_perm('gym.gym_trainer') ) and edit_user.userprofile.gym_id != request.user.userprofile.gym_id: return HttpResponseForbidden() # NO check: is the target user more privileged than the requeste
- Products
- wger
- Affected versions
- 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.2, 1.2rc1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.6.1, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, 2.1
- Fixed versions
- Not specified
- CVEs
- CVE-2026-46434
- Confirmed fixed CVEs
- Not specified
- Updated in this feed
- 30 Oct 2026, 18:13 UTC · Revision 1
Source evidence
wger: Trainer Privilege Escalation - Improper Privilege Management
core-osv · Original sourcePublished 15 Oct 2026, 10:22 UTC
### Summary A user with only the `gym_trainer` permission can deactivate any account in the same gym, including `gym_manager` and `general_gym_manager` accounts. The `UserDeactivateView` grants access to anyone holding **any one** of `gym.manage_gym`, `gym.manage_gyms`, or `gym.gym_trainer` (OR logic via `WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin`), and performs no privilege-hierarchy check to prevent a lower-privileged role from disabling a higher-privileged one. ### Details `UserDeactivateView` (file: `wger/core/views/user.py`, line 378) is configured with: ```python permission_required = ('gym.manage_gym', 'gym.manage_gyms', 'gym.gym_trainer') ``` `WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin` (file: `wger/utils/generic_views.py`, line 48) treats this tuple as an OR check -- any single permission is sufficient: ```python class WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin(PermissionRequiredMixin): def has_permission(self): for permission in self.get_permission_required(): if self.request.user.has_perm(permission): return True # <-- ANY one permission is enough return False ``` The `dispatch()` method only verifies same-gym membership: ```python def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs): edit_user = get_object_or_404(User, pk=self.kwargs['pk']) if ( request.user.has_perm('gym.manage_gym') or request.user.has_perm('gym.gym_trainer') ) and edit_user.userprofile.gym_id != request.user.userprofile.gym_id: return HttpResponseForbidden() # NO check: is the target user more privileged than the requeste
osv:PYSEC-2026-4316
wger
Fixed versions: Not specified
Complete source record
{
"id": "55a8428017a1e35146389292d70718706f7f0f9ef09066b3faf8b0142b424335",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/PYSEC-2026-4316",
"method": "structured",
"payload": {
"kind": "advisory",
"title": "wger: Trainer Privilege Escalation - Improper Privilege Management",
"summary": "### Summary A user with only the `gym_trainer` permission can deactivate any account in the same gym, including `gym_manager` and `general_gym_manager` accounts. The `UserDeactivateView` grants access to anyone holding **any one** of `gym.manage_gym`, `gym.manage_gyms`, or `gym.gym_trainer` (OR logic via `WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin`), and performs no privilege-hierarchy check to prevent a lower-privileged role from disabling a higher-privileged one. ### Details `UserDeactivateView` (file: `wger/core/views/user.py`, line 378) is configured with: ```python permission_required = ('gym.manage_gym', 'gym.manage_gyms', 'gym.gym_trainer') ``` `WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin` (file: `wger/utils/generic_views.py`, line 48) treats this tuple as an OR check -- any single permission is sufficient: ```python class WgerMultiplePermissionRequiredMixin(PermissionRequiredMixin): def has_permission(self): for permission in self.get_permission_required(): if self.request.user.has_perm(permission): return True # <-- ANY one permission is enough return False ``` The `dispatch()` method only verifies same-gym membership: ```python def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs): edit_user = get_object_or_404(User, pk=self.kwargs['pk']) if ( request.user.has_perm('gym.manage_gym') or request.user.has_perm('gym.gym_trainer') ) and edit_user.userprofile.gym_id != request.user.userprofile.gym_id: return HttpResponseForbidden() # NO check: is the target user more privileged than the requeste",
"evidence": "osv:PYSEC-2026-4316",
"products": [
{
"name": {
"value": "wger",
"evidence": "/affected/0/package/name"
},
"prerequisites": [],
"fixed_versions": [],
"affected_versions": [
{
"value": "1.1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "1.1.1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "1.2",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "1.2rc1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "1.3",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "1.4",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "1.5",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "1.6",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "1.6.1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "1.7",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "1.8",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "1.9",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "2.0",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "2.1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
}
]
}
],
"severity": "high",
"structured": {
"id": "PYSEC-2026-4316",
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-46434",
"GHSA-x249-cx55-2h87",
"PYSEC-2026-4316"
],
"metrics": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N"
}
],
"affected": [
{
"ranges": [
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2.1"
}
]
}
],
"package": {
"name": "wger",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/wger",
"ecosystem": "PyPI"
},
"versions": [
"1.1",
"1.1.1",
"1.2",
"1.2rc1",
"1.3",
"1.4",
"1.5",
"1.6",
"1.6.1",
"1.7",
"1.8",
"1.9",
"2.0",
"2.1"
],
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/vulns/wger/PYSEC-2026-4316.yaml"
}
}
],
"modified": "2026-10-15T14:45:10.347690155Z",
"provider": "osv",
"references": [
"https://github.com/wger-project/wger/security/advisories/GHSA-x249-cx55-2h87",
"https://github.com/wger-project/wger",
"https://github.com/wger-project/wger/releases/tag/2.6",
"https://pypi.org/project/wger",
"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x249-cx55-2h87",
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46434"
]
},
"related_cves": [
{
"value": "CVE-2026-46434",
"evidence": "/aliases"
}
],
"security_relevant": true,
"severity_evidence": "/severity/0/score"
},
"source_id": "core-osv",
"document_id": 332650,
"published_at": "2026-10-15T10:22:47.076447+00:00"
}