linux — security advisory
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was allocated, but the call to scsi_add_host() didn't happen. And that pattern happens to exist in some error paths, for example. Syzkaller causes that by using USB raw gadget device, error'ing on usb-storage driver, at usb_stor_probe2(). By checking that path, we can see that the BadDevice label leads to a scsi_host_put() after a SCSI host allocation, but there's no call to scsi_add_host() in such path. That leads to messages like this in dmesg (and a leak of the SCSI host proc structure): usb-storage 4-1:8
- Products
- linux
- Affected versions
- 6.1.27-1, 6.1.37-1, 6.1.38-1, 6.1.38-2, 6.1.38-2~bpo11+1, 6.1.38-3, 6.1.38-4, 6.1.38-4~bpo11+1, 6.1.52-1, 6.1.55-1, 6.1.55-1~bpo11+1, 6.1.64-1, 6.1.66-1, 6.1.67-1, 6.1.69-1, 6.1.69-1~bpo11+1, 6.1.76-1, 6.1.76-1~bpo11+1, 6.1.82-1
- Fixed versions
- 6.1.85-1, 6.7.12-1
- CVEs
- CVE-2024-26935
- Confirmed fixed CVEs
- Not specified
- Updated in this feed
- 30 Oct 2026, 16:37 UTC · Revision 1
Source evidence
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was allocated, but the call to scsi_add_host() didn't happen. And that pattern happens to exist in some error paths, for example. Syzkaller causes that by using USB raw gadget device, error'ing on usb-storage driver, at usb_stor_probe2(). By checking that path, we can see that the BadDevice label leads to a scsi_host_put() after a SCSI host allocation, but there's no call to scsi_add_host() in such path. That leads to messages like this in dmesg (and a leak of the SCSI host proc structure): usb-storage 4-1:8
osv:DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26935
linux
Fixed versions: 6.1.85-1
linux
Fixed versions: 6.7.12-1
linux
Fixed versions: 6.7.12-1
Complete source record
{
"id": "33776cb9996ef35b321cbf9bba6f82fc2ab889b19d44ca9f8a46a282c3453d9e",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26935",
"method": "structured",
"payload": {
"kind": "advisory",
"title": "DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26935",
"summary": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 (\"scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier\") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe (\"scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression\"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function \"pairs\" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was allocated, but the call to scsi_add_host() didn't happen. And that pattern happens to exist in some error paths, for example. Syzkaller causes that by using USB raw gadget device, error'ing on usb-storage driver, at usb_stor_probe2(). By checking that path, we can see that the BadDevice label leads to a scsi_host_put() after a SCSI host allocation, but there's no call to scsi_add_host() in such path. That leads to messages like this in dmesg (and a leak of the SCSI host proc structure): usb-storage 4-1:8",
"evidence": "osv:DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26935",
"products": [
{
"name": {
"value": "linux",
"evidence": "/affected/0/package/name"
},
"prerequisites": [],
"fixed_versions": [
{
"value": "6.1.85-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/ranges"
}
],
"affected_versions": [
{
"value": "6.1.27-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.37-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-2",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-2~bpo11+1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-3",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-4",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-4~bpo11+1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.52-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.55-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.55-1~bpo11+1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.64-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.66-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.67-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.69-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.69-1~bpo11+1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.76-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.76-1~bpo11+1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.82-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
}
]
},
{
"name": {
"value": "linux",
"evidence": "/affected/1/package/name"
},
"prerequisites": [],
"fixed_versions": [
{
"value": "6.7.12-1",
"evidence": "/affected/1/ranges"
}
],
"affected_versions": []
},
{
"name": {
"value": "linux",
"evidence": "/affected/2/package/name"
},
"prerequisites": [],
"fixed_versions": [
{
"value": "6.7.12-1",
"evidence": "/affected/2/ranges"
}
],
"affected_versions": []
}
],
"severity": "medium",
"structured": {
"id": "DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26935",
"aliases": [
"DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26935"
],
"metrics": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
}
],
"affected": [
{
"ranges": [
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.1.85-1"
}
]
}
],
"package": {
"name": "linux",
"purl": "pkg:deb/debian/linux?arch=source&distro=bookworm",
"ecosystem": "Debian:12"
},
"versions": [
"6.1.27-1",
"6.1.37-1",
"6.1.38-1",
"6.1.38-2",
"6.1.38-2~bpo11+1",
"6.1.38-3",
"6.1.38-4",
"6.1.38-4~bpo11+1",
"6.1.52-1",
"6.1.55-1",
"6.1.55-1~bpo11+1",
"6.1.64-1",
"6.1.66-1",
"6.1.67-1",
"6.1.69-1",
"6.1.69-1~bpo11+1",
"6.1.76-1",
"6.1.76-1~bpo11+1",
"6.1.82-1"
],
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/debian-osv/debian-cve-osv/DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26935.json"
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"urgency": "not yet assigned"
}
},
{
"ranges": [
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.7.12-1"
}
]
}
],
"package": {
"name": "linux",
"purl": "pkg:deb/debian/linux?arch=source&distro=trixie",
"ecosystem": "Debian:13"
},
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/debian-osv/debian-cve-osv/DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26935.json"
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"urgency": "not yet assigned"
}
},
{
"ranges": [
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.7.12-1"
}
]
}
],
"package": {
"name": "linux",
"purl": "pkg:deb/debian/linux?arch=source&distro=forky",
"ecosystem": "Debian:14"
},
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/debian-osv/debian-cve-osv/DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26935.json"
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"urgency": "not yet assigned"
}
}
],
"modified": "2026-10-15T09:47:35.438437844Z",
"provider": "osv",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-26935"
],
"references": [
"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26935"
]
},
"related_cves": [
{
"value": "CVE-2024-26935",
"evidence": "/upstream"
}
],
"security_relevant": true,
"severity_evidence": "/severity/0/score"
},
"source_id": "core-osv",
"document_id": 327801,
"published_at": "2024-05-01T06:15:08.24+00:00"
}