fs: preserve ACL_DONT_CACHE state in forget_cached_acl()
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs: preserve ACL_DONT_CACHE state in forget_cached_acl() The ACL_DONT_CACHE state is meant to be a constant state for the inode for filesystems that want to opt out of posix acl caching. Commit facd61053cff1 ("fuse: fixes after adapting to new posix acl api") used this facility to opt out of posix acl caching for fuse inodes with fuse server that does not negotiate FUSE_POSIX_ACL (fc->posix_acl). The commit also takes care to gate the forget_all_cached_acls() call in fuse_set_acl() on fc->posix_acl because there is no need for it, but there are other placed in fuse code which call forget_all_cached_acls() unconditional to fc->posix_acl and those cause the loss of the ACL_DONT_CACHE state. This is not only a functional bug. Properly timed, a get_acl() from this fuse filesystem can return a stale cached value, as was observed in tests, because set_acl() does not invalidate the unintentional acl cache. We could fix this in fuse, but it actually makes no sense for the vfs helper forget_cached_acl() to invalidate the ACL_DONT_CACHE state, so let it not do that to fix fuse and future users of ACL_DONT_CACHE.
- Products
- Kernel
- Affected versions
- Not specified
- Fixed versions
- 6.12.101, 6.18.42, 6.6.148, 7.1.6
- CVEs
- CVE-2026-68149
- Confirmed fixed CVEs
- Not specified
- Updated in this feed
- 7 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC · Revision 1
Source evidence
fs: preserve ACL_DONT_CACHE state in forget_cached_acl()
core-osv · Original sourcePublished 10 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs: preserve ACL_DONT_CACHE state in forget_cached_acl() The ACL_DONT_CACHE state is meant to be a constant state for the inode for filesystems that want to opt out of posix acl caching. Commit facd61053cff1 ("fuse: fixes after adapting to new posix acl api") used this facility to opt out of posix acl caching for fuse inodes with fuse server that does not negotiate FUSE_POSIX_ACL (fc->posix_acl). The commit also takes care to gate the forget_all_cached_acls() call in fuse_set_acl() on fc->posix_acl because there is no need for it, but there are other placed in fuse code which call forget_all_cached_acls() unconditional to fc->posix_acl and those cause the loss of the ACL_DONT_CACHE state. This is not only a functional bug. Properly timed, a get_acl() from this fuse filesystem can return a stale cached value, as was observed in tests, because set_acl() does not invalidate the unintentional acl cache. We could fix this in fuse, but it actually makes no sense for the vfs helper forget_cached_acl() to invalidate the ACL_DONT_CACHE state, so let it not do that to fix fuse and future users of ACL_DONT_CACHE.
osv:CVE-2026-68149
Kernel
Fixed versions: 6.6.148, 6.12.101, 6.18.42, 7.1.6
Complete source record
{
"id": "89474c779cffbd3e921dffd8e109a497f2b42746146709a359080f1891d74679",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-68149",
"method": "structured",
"payload": {
"kind": "advisory",
"title": "fs: preserve ACL_DONT_CACHE state in forget_cached_acl()",
"summary": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs: preserve ACL_DONT_CACHE state in forget_cached_acl() The ACL_DONT_CACHE state is meant to be a constant state for the inode for filesystems that want to opt out of posix acl caching. Commit facd61053cff1 (\"fuse: fixes after adapting to new posix acl api\") used this facility to opt out of posix acl caching for fuse inodes with fuse server that does not negotiate FUSE_POSIX_ACL (fc->posix_acl). The commit also takes care to gate the forget_all_cached_acls() call in fuse_set_acl() on fc->posix_acl because there is no need for it, but there are other placed in fuse code which call forget_all_cached_acls() unconditional to fc->posix_acl and those cause the loss of the ACL_DONT_CACHE state. This is not only a functional bug. Properly timed, a get_acl() from this fuse filesystem can return a stale cached value, as was observed in tests, because set_acl() does not invalidate the unintentional acl cache. We could fix this in fuse, but it actually makes no sense for the vfs helper forget_cached_acl() to invalidate the ACL_DONT_CACHE state, so let it not do that to fix fuse and future users of ACL_DONT_CACHE.",
"evidence": "osv:CVE-2026-68149",
"products": [
{
"name": {
"value": "Kernel",
"evidence": "/affected/1/package/name"
},
"prerequisites": [],
"fixed_versions": [
{
"value": "6.6.148",
"evidence": "/affected/1/ranges"
},
{
"value": "6.12.101",
"evidence": "/affected/1/ranges"
},
{
"value": "6.18.42",
"evidence": "/affected/1/ranges"
},
{
"value": "7.1.6",
"evidence": "/affected/1/ranges"
}
],
"affected_versions": []
}
],
"severity": "high",
"structured": {
"id": "CVE-2026-68149",
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-68149"
],
"metrics": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N"
}
],
"affected": [
{
"ranges": [
{
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"type": "GIT",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "facd61053cff100973921d4d45d47cf53c747ec6"
},
{
"fixed": "b98fad81f1202b0eb26aacf3ff4cc7a21ed3b5bf"
},
{
"fixed": "834ddf899484a2f23129080e8773bc04f4691d07"
},
{
"fixed": "a019b074903b3ad0a9726087efd0e8291452023b"
},
{
"fixed": "ca03a7984a34f48085fd013e0d2cf4e6420b4acf"
},
{
"fixed": "4b9a5458d02e214ef2b384124ca626e3e381d778"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/cve-osv-conversion/osv-output/CVE-2026-68149.json"
}
},
{
"ranges": [
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.148"
}
]
},
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.7.0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.12.101"
}
]
},
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.13.0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.18.42"
}
]
},
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.19.0"
},
{
"fixed": "7.1.6"
}
]
}
],
"package": {
"name": "Kernel",
"ecosystem": "Linux"
},
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/cve-osv-conversion/osv-output/CVE-2026-68149.json"
}
}
],
"modified": "2026-10-28T02:30:50.552560090Z",
"provider": "osv",
"references": [
"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b9a5458d02e214ef2b384124ca626e3e381d778",
"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/834ddf899484a2f23129080e8773bc04f4691d07",
"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a019b074903b3ad0a9726087efd0e8291452023b",
"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b98fad81f1202b0eb26aacf3ff4cc7a21ed3b5bf",
"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca03a7984a34f48085fd013e0d2cf4e6420b4acf",
"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/68xxx/CVE-2026-68149.json",
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68149",
"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git"
],
"provider_metadata": {
"cna_assigner": "Linux",
"osv_generated_from": "https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/68xxx/CVE-2026-68149.json"
}
},
"related_cves": [
{
"value": "CVE-2026-68149",
"evidence": "/id"
}
],
"security_relevant": true,
"severity_evidence": "/severity/0/score"
},
"source_id": "core-osv",
"document_id": 519077,
"published_at": "2026-08-10T11:59:14.645+00:00"
}