Security advisory
In Sorcery before 0.15.0, there is a brute force vulnerability when using password authentication via Sorcery. The brute force protection submodule will prevent a brute force attack for the defined lockout period, but once expired, protection will not be re-enabled until a user or malicious actor logs in successfully. This does not affect users that do not use the built-in brute force protection submodule, nor users that use permanent account lockout. This has been patched in 0.15.0.
- Products
- Not specified
- Affected versions
- Not specified
- Fixed versions
- Not specified
- CVEs
- CVE-2020-11052
- Confirmed fixed CVEs
- Not specified
- Updated in this feed
- 31 Oct 2026, 10:47 UTC · Revision 1
Source evidence
In Sorcery before 0.15.0, there is a brute force vulnerability when using password authentication via Sorcery. The brute force protection submodule will prevent a brute force attack for the defined lockout period, but once expired, protection will not be re-enabled until a user or malicious actor logs in successfully. This does not affect users that do not use the built-in brute force protection submodule, nor users that use permanent account lockout. This has been patched in 0.15.0.
osv:CVE-2020-11052
Complete source record
{
"id": "b117c122e9e49e5fd10b4c3485e94e600ec7fb6b0b21bdcce39d0dcdf328f3e7",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2020-11052",
"method": "structured",
"payload": {
"kind": "advisory",
"title": "CVE-2020-11052",
"summary": "In Sorcery before 0.15.0, there is a brute force vulnerability when using password authentication via Sorcery. The brute force protection submodule will prevent a brute force attack for the defined lockout period, but once expired, protection will not be re-enabled until a user or malicious actor logs in successfully. This does not affect users that do not use the built-in brute force protection submodule, nor users that use permanent account lockout. This has been patched in 0.15.0.",
"evidence": "osv:CVE-2020-11052",
"products": [],
"severity": "critical",
"structured": {
"id": "CVE-2020-11052",
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-11052",
"GHSA-jc8m-cxhj-668x"
],
"metrics": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
}
],
"affected": [
{
"ranges": [
{
"repo": "https://github.com/sorcery/sorcery",
"type": "GIT",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "e81c64c1775ad815ae42c75c4be0af41aed69e87"
},
{
"fixed": "0f116d223826895a73b12492f17486e5d54ab7a7"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"extracted_events": [
{
"cpe": "cpe:2.3:a:sorcery_project:sorcery:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*",
"range": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.15.0"
}
],
"source": "CPE_RANGE"
},
{
"range": [
{
"fixed": "0f116d223826895a73b12492f17486e5d54ab7a7"
}
],
"source": "REFERENCES_COMMIT"
}
]
}
}
],
"versions": [
"v0.14.0",
"v0.13.0",
"v0.12.0",
"0.11.0",
"v0.10.3",
"v0.10.2",
"v0.10.1",
"v0.10.0",
"v0.8.6",
"v0.8.5",
"show",
"v0.8.3",
"v0.8.2",
"v0.8.1",
"v0.8.0",
"v0.7.13",
"v0.7.12",
"v0.7.11",
"v0.7.10",
"v0.7.9",
"v0.7.8",
"v0.7.7",
"v0.7.6",
"v0.7.5",
"v0.7.4",
"v0.7.3",
"v0.7.2",
"v0.7.1",
"v0.7.0",
"v0.6.1",
"v0.6.0",
"v0.5.30",
"v0.5.3",
"v0.5.21",
"v0.5.2",
"v0.5.1",
"v0.5.0",
"v0.4.2",
"v0.4.1",
"v0.4.0",
"v0.3.1",
"v0.3.0",
"v0.2.1",
"v0.2.0",
"v0.1.4",
"v0.1.3",
"v0.1.2",
"v0.1.1",
"v0.1.0"
],
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/cve-osv-conversion/osv-output/CVE-2020-11052.json"
}
}
],
"modified": "2026-10-20T10:51:40.909085975Z",
"provider": "osv",
"references": [
"https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/issues/231",
"https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/security/advisories/GHSA-jc8m-cxhj-668x",
"https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/commit/0f116d223826895a73b12492f17486e5d54ab7a7",
"https://github.com/Sorcery/sorcery/pull/235"
],
"provider_metadata": {}
},
"related_cves": [
{
"value": "CVE-2020-11052",
"evidence": "/id"
}
],
"security_relevant": true,
"severity_evidence": "/severity/0/score"
},
"source_id": "core-osv",
"document_id": 382757,
"published_at": "2020-05-07T21:15:11.483+00:00"
}