linux — security advisory
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never sends NFS4_RELEASE_LOCKOWNER without first releasing any locks, so it knows that the error is impossible. It assumes the lock owner was in fact released so it feels free to use the same lock owner identifier in some later locking request. When it does reuse a lock owner identifier for which a previous RELEASE failed, it will naturally use a lock_seqid of zero. However the server, which didn't release the lock owner, will expect a larger lock_seqid and so will respond with NFS4ERR_BAD_SEQID. So clearly it
- Products
- linux
- Affected versions
- 6.1.27-1, 6.1.37-1, 6.1.38-1, 6.1.38-2, 6.1.38-2~bpo11+1, 6.1.38-3, 6.1.38-4, 6.1.38-4~bpo11+1, 6.1.52-1, 6.1.55-1, 6.1.55-1~bpo11+1, 6.1.64-1, 6.1.66-1, 6.1.67-1, 6.1.69-1, 6.1.69-1~bpo11+1, 6.1.76-1, 6.1.76-1~bpo11+1
- Fixed versions
- 6.1.82-1, 6.6.15-1
- CVEs
- CVE-2024-26629
- Confirmed fixed CVEs
- Not specified
- Updated in this feed
- 30 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC · Revision 1
Source evidence
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never sends NFS4_RELEASE_LOCKOWNER without first releasing any locks, so it knows that the error is impossible. It assumes the lock owner was in fact released so it feels free to use the same lock owner identifier in some later locking request. When it does reuse a lock owner identifier for which a previous RELEASE failed, it will naturally use a lock_seqid of zero. However the server, which didn't release the lock owner, will expect a larger lock_seqid and so will respond with NFS4ERR_BAD_SEQID. So clearly it
osv:DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26629
linux
Fixed versions: 6.1.82-1
linux
Fixed versions: 6.6.15-1
linux
Fixed versions: 6.6.15-1
Complete source record
{
"id": "55258552220ea5804784fb7c240df85a617ea908fa6f3bf53e0c336c606b937e",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26629",
"method": "structured",
"payload": {
"kind": "advisory",
"title": "DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26629",
"summary": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never sends NFS4_RELEASE_LOCKOWNER without first releasing any locks, so it knows that the error is impossible. It assumes the lock owner was in fact released so it feels free to use the same lock owner identifier in some later locking request. When it does reuse a lock owner identifier for which a previous RELEASE failed, it will naturally use a lock_seqid of zero. However the server, which didn't release the lock owner, will expect a larger lock_seqid and so will respond with NFS4ERR_BAD_SEQID. So clearly it ",
"evidence": "osv:DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26629",
"products": [
{
"name": {
"value": "linux",
"evidence": "/affected/0/package/name"
},
"prerequisites": [],
"fixed_versions": [
{
"value": "6.1.82-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/ranges"
}
],
"affected_versions": [
{
"value": "6.1.27-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.37-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-2",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-2~bpo11+1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-3",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-4",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.38-4~bpo11+1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.52-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.55-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.55-1~bpo11+1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.64-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.66-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.67-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.69-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.69-1~bpo11+1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.76-1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
},
{
"value": "6.1.76-1~bpo11+1",
"evidence": "/affected/0/versions"
}
]
},
{
"name": {
"value": "linux",
"evidence": "/affected/1/package/name"
},
"prerequisites": [],
"fixed_versions": [
{
"value": "6.6.15-1",
"evidence": "/affected/1/ranges"
}
],
"affected_versions": []
},
{
"name": {
"value": "linux",
"evidence": "/affected/2/package/name"
},
"prerequisites": [],
"fixed_versions": [
{
"value": "6.6.15-1",
"evidence": "/affected/2/ranges"
}
],
"affected_versions": []
}
],
"severity": "medium",
"structured": {
"id": "DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26629",
"aliases": [
"DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26629"
],
"metrics": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"
}
],
"affected": [
{
"ranges": [
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.1.82-1"
}
]
}
],
"package": {
"name": "linux",
"purl": "pkg:deb/debian/linux?arch=source&distro=bookworm",
"ecosystem": "Debian:12"
},
"versions": [
"6.1.27-1",
"6.1.37-1",
"6.1.38-1",
"6.1.38-2",
"6.1.38-2~bpo11+1",
"6.1.38-3",
"6.1.38-4",
"6.1.38-4~bpo11+1",
"6.1.52-1",
"6.1.55-1",
"6.1.55-1~bpo11+1",
"6.1.64-1",
"6.1.66-1",
"6.1.67-1",
"6.1.69-1",
"6.1.69-1~bpo11+1",
"6.1.76-1",
"6.1.76-1~bpo11+1"
],
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/debian-osv/debian-cve-osv/DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26629.json"
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"urgency": "not yet assigned"
}
},
{
"ranges": [
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.15-1"
}
]
}
],
"package": {
"name": "linux",
"purl": "pkg:deb/debian/linux?arch=source&distro=trixie",
"ecosystem": "Debian:13"
},
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/debian-osv/debian-cve-osv/DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26629.json"
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"urgency": "not yet assigned"
}
},
{
"ranges": [
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.15-1"
}
]
}
],
"package": {
"name": "linux",
"purl": "pkg:deb/debian/linux?arch=source&distro=forky",
"ecosystem": "Debian:14"
},
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/debian-osv/debian-cve-osv/DEBIAN-CVE-2024-26629.json"
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"urgency": "not yet assigned"
}
}
],
"modified": "2026-10-15T09:47:34.641683019Z",
"provider": "osv",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-26629"
],
"references": [
"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26629"
]
},
"related_cves": [
{
"value": "CVE-2024-26629",
"evidence": "/upstream"
}
],
"security_relevant": true,
"severity_evidence": "/severity/0/score"
},
"source_id": "core-osv",
"document_id": 327748,
"published_at": "2024-03-13T14:15:07.717+00:00"
}