Config Partition Not Measured From 2 Fronts
PCR14 is not in the list of PCRs that seal/unseal the “vault” key, but due to the change that was implemented in commit “7638364bc0acf8b5c481b5ce5fea11ad44ad7fd4”, fixing this issue alone would not solve the problem of the config partition not being measured correctly. Also, the “vault” key is sealed/unsealed with SHA1 PCRs instead of SHA256. This issue was somewhat mitigated due to all of the PCR extend functions updating both the values of SHA256 and SHA1 for a given PCR ID. However, due to the change that was implemented in commit “7638364bc0acf8b5c481b5ce5fea11ad44ad7fd4”, this is no longer the case for PCR14, as the code in “measurefs.go” explicitly updates only the SHA256 instance of PCR14, which means that even if PCR14 were to be added to the list of PCRs sealing/unsealing the “vault” key, changes to the config partition would still not be measured. An attacker could modify the config partition without triggering the measured boot, this could result in the attacker gaining full control over the device with full access to the contents of the encrypted “vault”
- Products
- Not specified
- Affected versions
- Not specified
- Fixed versions
- Not specified
- CVEs
- CVE-2023-43630
- Confirmed fixed CVEs
- Not specified
- Updated in this feed
- 5 Nov 2026, 05:49 UTC · Revision 1
Source evidence
Config Partition Not Measured From 2 Fronts
core-osv · Original sourcePublished 20 Sept 2023, 14:37 UTC
PCR14 is not in the list of PCRs that seal/unseal the “vault” key, but due to the change that was implemented in commit “7638364bc0acf8b5c481b5ce5fea11ad44ad7fd4”, fixing this issue alone would not solve the problem of the config partition not being measured correctly. Also, the “vault” key is sealed/unsealed with SHA1 PCRs instead of SHA256. This issue was somewhat mitigated due to all of the PCR extend functions updating both the values of SHA256 and SHA1 for a given PCR ID. However, due to the change that was implemented in commit “7638364bc0acf8b5c481b5ce5fea11ad44ad7fd4”, this is no longer the case for PCR14, as the code in “measurefs.go” explicitly updates only the SHA256 instance of PCR14, which means that even if PCR14 were to be added to the list of PCRs sealing/unsealing the “vault” key, changes to the config partition would still not be measured. An attacker could modify the config partition without triggering the measured boot, this could result in the attacker gaining full control over the device with full access to the contents of the encrypted “vault”
osv:CVE-2023-43630
Complete source record
{
"id": "1f89fa2743f2f181f7973bbc43e16276032a3428124866448263b4558de5015e",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-43630",
"method": "structured",
"payload": {
"kind": "advisory",
"title": "Config Partition Not Measured From 2 Fronts",
"summary": "PCR14 is not in the list of PCRs that seal/unseal the “vault” key, but due to the change that was implemented in commit “7638364bc0acf8b5c481b5ce5fea11ad44ad7fd4”, fixing this issue alone would not solve the problem of the config partition not being measured correctly. Also, the “vault” key is sealed/unsealed with SHA1 PCRs instead of SHA256. This issue was somewhat mitigated due to all of the PCR extend functions updating both the values of SHA256 and SHA1 for a given PCR ID. However, due to the change that was implemented in commit “7638364bc0acf8b5c481b5ce5fea11ad44ad7fd4”, this is no longer the case for PCR14, as the code in “measurefs.go” explicitly updates only the SHA256 instance of PCR14, which means that even if PCR14 were to be added to the list of PCRs sealing/unsealing the “vault” key, changes to the config partition would still not be measured. An attacker could modify the config partition without triggering the measured boot, this could result in the attacker gaining full control over the device with full access to the contents of the encrypted “vault”",
"evidence": "osv:CVE-2023-43630",
"products": [],
"severity": "high",
"structured": {
"id": "CVE-2023-43630",
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-43630",
"GHSA-phcg-h58r-gmcq",
"GO-2026-4430"
],
"metrics": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H"
}
],
"affected": [
{
"ranges": [
{
"repo": "https://github.com/lf-edge/eve",
"type": "GIT",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "eb72104ab35399a34c3cc88c2222f793f5f51c90"
},
{
"fixed": "c9e9dcb434803828b1c9972fbb02f87f76bd3153"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"extracted_events": [
{
"range": [
{
"introduced": "9.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.5.0"
}
],
"source": "AFFECTED_FIELD",
"strategy": "StandardRange"
}
]
}
}
],
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/cve-osv-conversion/osv-output/CVE-2023-43630.json"
}
}
],
"modified": "2026-10-28T02:30:43.214599265Z",
"provider": "osv",
"references": [
"https://asrg.io/security-advisories/cve-2023-43630/",
"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2023/43xxx/CVE-2023-43630.json",
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-43630",
"https://github.com/lf-edge/eve"
],
"provider_metadata": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-328",
"CWE-522",
"CWE-922"
],
"cna_assigner": "ASRG",
"osv_generated_from": "https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2023/43xxx/CVE-2023-43630.json"
}
},
"related_cves": [
{
"value": "CVE-2023-43630",
"evidence": "/id"
}
],
"security_relevant": true,
"severity_evidence": "/severity/0/score"
},
"source_id": "core-osv",
"document_id": 510834,
"published_at": "2023-09-20T14:37:44.564+00:00"
}