Security advisory
In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2 up to and including 1.25.1, when Unbound is configured with the 'respip' module in front of the validator together with a 'response-ip' redirect rule or an RPZ file with an RPZ-IP trigger, the rewriting handler does not check the security status of the upstream answer and can instead rewrite a BOGUS A/AAAA answer to point to an operator's configured IP. If the validator finds an expired or otherwise invalid RRSIG on an answer whose A record falls within a 'response-ip'/RPZ configuration, the answer is still rewritten and given a hard coded security level of INSECURE. This results in the client receiving an INSECURE NOERROR reply rewritten by the operator's configured IP. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by spoofing a BOGUS A/AAAA answer that falls inside the operator's configured subnet rewrites. Such DNSSEC protected answers are then insecurely redirected to the operator's configured target.
- Products
- Not specified
- Affected versions
- Not specified
- Fixed versions
- Not specified
- CVEs
- CVE-2026-50243
- Confirmed fixed CVEs
- Not specified
- Updated in this feed
- 1 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC · Revision 1
Source evidence
In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2 up to and including 1.25.1, when Unbound is configured with the 'respip' module in front of the validator together with a 'response-ip' redirect rule or an RPZ file with an RPZ-IP trigger, the rewriting handler does not check the security status of the upstream answer and can instead rewrite a BOGUS A/AAAA answer to point to an operator's configured IP. If the validator finds an expired or otherwise invalid RRSIG on an answer whose A record falls within a 'response-ip'/RPZ configuration, the answer is still rewritten and given a hard coded security level of INSECURE. This results in the client receiving an INSECURE NOERROR reply rewritten by the operator's configured IP. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by spoofing a BOGUS A/AAAA answer that falls inside the operator's configured subnet rewrites. Such DNSSEC protected answers are then insecurely redirected to the operator's configured target.
osv:CVE-2026-50243
Complete source record
{
"id": "b469b3413a190d26e3d8e7147249edb23298d34fd7636320ebb69bb8054189aa",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50243",
"method": "structured",
"payload": {
"kind": "advisory",
"title": "CVE-2026-50243",
"summary": "In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2 up to and including 1.25.1, when Unbound is configured with the 'respip' module in front of the validator together with a 'response-ip' redirect rule or an RPZ file with an RPZ-IP trigger, the rewriting handler does not check the security status of the upstream answer and can instead rewrite a BOGUS A/AAAA answer to point to an operator's configured IP. If the validator finds an expired or otherwise invalid RRSIG on an answer whose A record falls within a 'response-ip'/RPZ configuration, the answer is still rewritten and given a hard coded security level of INSECURE. This results in the client receiving an INSECURE NOERROR reply rewritten by the operator's configured IP. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by spoofing a BOGUS A/AAAA answer that falls inside the operator's configured subnet rewrites. Such DNSSEC protected answers are then insecurely redirected to the operator's configured target.",
"evidence": "osv:CVE-2026-50243",
"products": [],
"severity": "low",
"structured": {
"id": "CVE-2026-50243",
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-50243"
],
"metrics": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N"
}
],
"affected": [
{
"ranges": [
{
"repo": "https://github.com/nlnetlabs/unbound",
"type": "GIT",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "93732890aaae9ced2d55ce13b12ce01dc06d9e31"
},
{
"fixed": "c33ad1b1a21e48bfe4f140e90252a9be1b0c5745"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"extracted_events": [
{
"cpe": "cpe:2.3:a:nlnetlabs:unbound:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"range": [
{
"introduced": "1.6.2"
},
{
"fixed": "1.25.2"
}
],
"source": "CPE_RANGE"
}
]
}
}
],
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/cve-osv-conversion/osv-output/CVE-2026-50243.json"
}
}
],
"modified": "2026-10-26T02:31:00.719155497Z",
"provider": "osv",
"references": [
"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-50243.txt"
],
"provider_metadata": {}
},
"related_cves": [
{
"value": "CVE-2026-50243",
"evidence": "/id"
}
],
"security_relevant": true,
"severity_evidence": "/severity/0/score"
},
"source_id": "core-osv",
"document_id": 446685,
"published_at": "2026-07-22T14:17:20.24+00:00"
}