Skip to content
Heist/ feed
Back to feed
Low

Security advisory

Type: advisorySources: OSVCVE: CVE-2026-50243

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2 up to and including 1.25.1, when Unbound is configured with the 'respip' module in front of the validator together with a 'response-ip' redirect rule or an RPZ file with an RPZ-IP trigger, the rewriting handler does not check the security status of the upstream answer and can instead rewrite a BOGUS A/AAAA answer to point to an operator's configured IP. If the validator finds an expired or otherwise invalid RRSIG on an answer whose A record falls within a 'response-ip'/RPZ configuration, the answer is still rewritten and given a hard coded security level of INSECURE. This results in the client receiving an INSECURE NOERROR reply rewritten by the operator's configured IP. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by spoofing a BOGUS A/AAAA answer that falls inside the operator's configured subnet rewrites. Such DNSSEC protected answers are then insecurely redirected to the operator's configured target.

Products
Not specified
Affected versions
Not specified
Fixed versions
Not specified
CVEs
CVE-2026-50243
Confirmed fixed CVEs
Not specified
Updated in this feed
1 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC · Revision 1

Source evidence

CVE-2026-50243

core-osv · Original source

Published 22 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2 up to and including 1.25.1, when Unbound is configured with the 'respip' module in front of the validator together with a 'response-ip' redirect rule or an RPZ file with an RPZ-IP trigger, the rewriting handler does not check the security status of the upstream answer and can instead rewrite a BOGUS A/AAAA answer to point to an operator's configured IP. If the validator finds an expired or otherwise invalid RRSIG on an answer whose A record falls within a 'response-ip'/RPZ configuration, the answer is still rewritten and given a hard coded security level of INSECURE. This results in the client receiving an INSECURE NOERROR reply rewritten by the operator's configured IP. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by spoofing a BOGUS A/AAAA answer that falls inside the operator's configured subnet rewrites. Such DNSSEC protected answers are then insecurely redirected to the operator's configured target.

osv:CVE-2026-50243
Complete source record
{
  "id": "b469b3413a190d26e3d8e7147249edb23298d34fd7636320ebb69bb8054189aa",
  "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50243",
  "method": "structured",
  "payload": {
    "kind": "advisory",
    "title": "CVE-2026-50243",
    "summary": "In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2 up to and including 1.25.1, when Unbound is configured with the 'respip' module in front of the validator together with a 'response-ip' redirect rule or an RPZ file with an RPZ-IP trigger, the rewriting handler does not check the security status of the upstream answer and can instead rewrite a BOGUS A/AAAA answer to point to an operator's configured IP. If the validator finds an expired or otherwise invalid RRSIG on an answer whose A record falls within a 'response-ip'/RPZ configuration, the answer is still rewritten and given a hard coded security level of INSECURE. This results in the client receiving an INSECURE NOERROR reply rewritten by the operator's configured IP. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by spoofing a BOGUS A/AAAA answer that falls inside the operator's configured subnet rewrites. Such DNSSEC protected answers are then insecurely redirected to the operator's configured target.",
    "evidence": "osv:CVE-2026-50243",
    "products": [],
    "severity": "low",
    "structured": {
      "id": "CVE-2026-50243",
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2026-50243"
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "type": "CVSS_V3",
          "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N"
        }
      ],
      "affected": [
        {
          "ranges": [
            {
              "repo": "https://github.com/nlnetlabs/unbound",
              "type": "GIT",
              "events": [
                {
                  "introduced": "93732890aaae9ced2d55ce13b12ce01dc06d9e31"
                },
                {
                  "fixed": "c33ad1b1a21e48bfe4f140e90252a9be1b0c5745"
                }
              ],
              "database_specific": {
                "extracted_events": [
                  {
                    "cpe": "cpe:2.3:a:nlnetlabs:unbound:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "range": [
                      {
                        "introduced": "1.6.2"
                      },
                      {
                        "fixed": "1.25.2"
                      }
                    ],
                    "source": "CPE_RANGE"
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          ],
          "database_specific": {
            "source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/cve-osv-conversion/osv-output/CVE-2026-50243.json"
          }
        }
      ],
      "modified": "2026-10-26T02:31:00.719155497Z",
      "provider": "osv",
      "references": [
        "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-50243.txt"
      ],
      "provider_metadata": {}
    },
    "related_cves": [
      {
        "value": "CVE-2026-50243",
        "evidence": "/id"
      }
    ],
    "security_relevant": true,
    "severity_evidence": "/severity/0/score"
  },
  "source_id": "core-osv",
  "document_id": 446685,
  "published_at": "2026-07-22T14:17:20.24+00:00"
}