Skip to content
Heist/ feed
Back to feed
UnratedFix available

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting')

Type: advisorySources: OSV

### Summary Insufficient validation of outbound header values may lead to request splitting or response splitting attacks in scenarios where attackers have sufficient control over outbound headers. ### Details Outbound `trillium_http::HeaderValue` and `trillium_http::HeaderName` can be constructed infallibly and were not checked for illegal bytes when sending requests. Thus, if an attacker has sufficient control over header values (or names) in a request that they could inject `\r\n` sequences, they could get the client and server out of sync, and then pivot to gain control over other parts of requests or responses. (i.e. exfiltrating data from other requests, SSRF, etc.) ### Patches #### trillium-client >= 0.5.4: * If any header name or header value is invalid in the client request headers, awaiting the client Conn returns an `Error::MalformedHeader` prior to any network access. ### Workarounds trillium client applications should sanitize or validate untrusted input that is included in header values and header names. Carriage return, newline, and null characters are not allowed. ### Impact This only affects use cases where attackers have control of outbound headers, and can insert "\r\n" sequences. Specifically, if untrusted and unvalidated input is inserted into header names or values. ### Credit Discovered and reported by [@divergentdave](https://github.com/divergentdave)

Products
trillium-client
Affected versions
Not specified
Fixed versions
0.5.4
CVEs
CVE-2024-23644
Confirmed fixed CVEs
Not specified
Updated in this feed
30 Oct 2026, 08:42 UTC · Revision 1

Source evidence

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting')

core-osv · Original source

Published 23 Jan 2024, 12:00 UTC

### Summary Insufficient validation of outbound header values may lead to request splitting or response splitting attacks in scenarios where attackers have sufficient control over outbound headers. ### Details Outbound `trillium_http::HeaderValue` and `trillium_http::HeaderName` can be constructed infallibly and were not checked for illegal bytes when sending requests. Thus, if an attacker has sufficient control over header values (or names) in a request that they could inject `\r\n` sequences, they could get the client and server out of sync, and then pivot to gain control over other parts of requests or responses. (i.e. exfiltrating data from other requests, SSRF, etc.) ### Patches #### trillium-client >= 0.5.4: * If any header name or header value is invalid in the client request headers, awaiting the client Conn returns an `Error::MalformedHeader` prior to any network access. ### Workarounds trillium client applications should sanitize or validate untrusted input that is included in header values and header names. Carriage return, newline, and null characters are not allowed. ### Impact This only affects use cases where attackers have control of outbound headers, and can insert "\r\n" sequences. Specifically, if untrusted and unvalidated input is inserted into header names or values. ### Credit Discovered and reported by [@divergentdave](https://github.com/divergentdave)

osv:RUSTSEC-2024-0008

trillium-client

Fixed versions: 0.5.4

Complete source record
{
  "id": "807bc2b7c3352c3ee6938f59bde01ed56482db7658cc4a070fa8602cf2a85ab3",
  "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/RUSTSEC-2024-0008",
  "method": "structured",
  "payload": {
    "kind": "advisory",
    "title": "Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting')",
    "summary": "### Summary Insufficient validation of outbound header values may lead to request splitting or response splitting attacks in scenarios where attackers have sufficient control over outbound headers. ### Details Outbound `trillium_http::HeaderValue` and `trillium_http::HeaderName` can be constructed infallibly and were not checked for illegal bytes when sending requests. Thus, if an attacker has sufficient control over header values (or names) in a request that they could inject `\\r\\n` sequences, they could get the client and server out of sync, and then pivot to gain control over other parts of requests or responses. (i.e. exfiltrating data from other requests, SSRF, etc.) ### Patches #### trillium-client >= 0.5.4: * If any header name or header value is invalid in the client request headers, awaiting the client Conn returns an `Error::MalformedHeader` prior to any network access. ### Workarounds trillium client applications should sanitize or validate untrusted input that is included in header values and header names. Carriage return, newline, and null characters are not allowed. ### Impact This only affects use cases where attackers have control of outbound headers, and can insert \"\\r\\n\" sequences. Specifically, if untrusted and unvalidated input is inserted into header names or values. ### Credit Discovered and reported by [@divergentdave](https://github.com/divergentdave)",
    "evidence": "osv:RUSTSEC-2024-0008",
    "products": [
      {
        "name": {
          "value": "trillium-client",
          "evidence": "/affected/0/package/name"
        },
        "prerequisites": [],
        "fixed_versions": [
          {
            "value": "0.5.4",
            "evidence": "/affected/0/ranges"
          }
        ],
        "affected_versions": []
      }
    ],
    "severity": "unknown",
    "structured": {
      "id": "RUSTSEC-2024-0008",
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2024-23644",
        "GHSA-9f9p-cp3c-72jf",
        "RUSTSEC-2024-0008",
        "RUSTSEC-2024-0009"
      ],
      "affected": [
        {
          "ranges": [
            {
              "type": "SEMVER",
              "events": [
                {
                  "introduced": "0.0.0-0"
                },
                {
                  "fixed": "0.5.4"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "package": {
            "name": "trillium-client",
            "purl": "pkg:cargo/trillium-client",
            "ecosystem": "crates.io"
          },
          "database_specific": {
            "cvss": null,
            "source": "https://github.com/rustsec/advisory-db/blob/osv/crates/RUSTSEC-2024-0008.json",
            "categories": [],
            "informational": null
          },
          "ecosystem_specific": {
            "affects": {
              "os": [],
              "arch": [],
              "functions": []
            },
            "affected_functions": null
          }
        }
      ],
      "modified": "2026-10-12T18:00:04.411727840Z",
      "provider": "osv",
      "references": [
        "https://crates.io/crates/trillium-client",
        "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0008.html",
        "https://github.com/trillium-rs/trillium/commit/16a42b3f8378a3fa4e61ece3e3e37e6a530df51d"
      ],
      "provider_metadata": {
        "license": "CC0-1.0"
      }
    },
    "related_cves": [
      {
        "value": "CVE-2024-23644",
        "evidence": "/aliases"
      }
    ],
    "security_relevant": true,
    "severity_evidence": null
  },
  "source_id": "core-osv",
  "document_id": 306338,
  "published_at": "2024-01-23T12:00:00+00:00"
}