Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Products
- Not specified
- Affected versions
- Not specified
- Fixed versions
- Not specified
- CVEs
- CVE-2024-28250
- Confirmed fixed CVEs
- Not specified
- Updated in this feed
- 5 Nov 2026, 05:37 UTC · Revision 1
Source evidence
Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies
core-osv · Original sourcePublished 18 Mar 2024, 21:42 UTC
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue.
osv:CVE-2024-28250
Complete source record
{
"id": "ca6b6a8323b0928f36febb6a0f13bbc1d5a4a480b3f07b3a6fef8261f74fea8c",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2024-28250",
"method": "structured",
"payload": {
"kind": "advisory",
"title": "Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies",
"summary": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue.",
"evidence": "osv:CVE-2024-28250",
"products": [],
"severity": "medium",
"structured": {
"id": "CVE-2024-28250",
"aliases": [
"BIT-cilium-2024-28250",
"BIT-cilium-operator-2024-28250",
"BIT-cilium-proxy-2024-28250",
"BIT-hubble-2024-28250",
"BIT-hubble-relay-2024-28250",
"BIT-hubble-ui-2024-28250",
"BIT-hubble-ui-backend-2024-28250",
"CVE-2024-28250",
"GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6",
"GO-2024-2657"
],
"metrics": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N"
}
],
"affected": [
{
"ranges": [
{
"repo": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium",
"type": "GIT",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "b5013e1562dbfe442dd2011a5af46de9095315ff"
},
{
"fixed": "cf6e022edbedc39c35237330ab85c158ff17f207"
},
{
"introduced": "2db45c468981a863b230186ad37d44e5a7c08d61"
},
{
"fixed": "7cf5782920423b07e7a4e6e67fafd81e1d4a1d33"
},
{
"fixed": "ca1af73ffe025e2ebdb6c8cd5b2cfb1909cb3b06"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"extracted_events": [
{
"cpe": "cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"range": [
{
"introduced": "1.14.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.14.8"
}
],
"source": "CPE_RANGE"
},
{
"cpe": "cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"range": [
{
"introduced": "1.15.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.2"
}
],
"source": "CPE_RANGE"
},
{
"range": [
{
"fixed": "ca1af73ffe025e2ebdb6c8cd5b2cfb1909cb3b06"
}
],
"source": "REFERENCES_TAG",
"original_tag": "v1.13.13"
},
{
"range": [
{
"fixed": "cf6e022edbedc39c35237330ab85c158ff17f207"
}
],
"source": "REFERENCES_TAG",
"original_tag": "v1.14.8"
},
{
"range": [
{
"fixed": "7cf5782920423b07e7a4e6e67fafd81e1d4a1d33"
}
],
"source": "REFERENCES_TAG",
"original_tag": "v1.15.2"
}
]
}
}
],
"versions": [
"v1.15.1",
"1.15.1",
"v1.14.7",
"1.14.7",
"v1.15.0",
"1.15.0",
"v1.14.6",
"1.14.6",
"v1.14.5",
"1.14.5",
"v1.14.4",
"1.14.4",
"v1.14.3",
"1.14.3",
"v1.14.2",
"1.14.2",
"v1.14.1",
"1.14.1",
"v1.14.0",
"1.14.0"
],
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/cve-osv-conversion/osv-output/CVE-2024-28250.json"
}
}
],
"modified": "2026-10-28T02:30:43.027921326Z",
"provider": "osv",
"references": [
"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13",
"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8",
"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2",
"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2024/28xxx/CVE-2024-28250.json",
"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6",
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-28250"
],
"provider_metadata": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-311"
],
"cna_assigner": "GitHub_M",
"osv_generated_from": "https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2024/28xxx/CVE-2024-28250.json"
}
},
"related_cves": [
{
"value": "CVE-2024-28250",
"evidence": "/id"
}
],
"security_relevant": true,
"severity_evidence": "/severity/0/score"
},
"source_id": "core-osv",
"document_id": 510754,
"published_at": "2024-03-18T21:42:21.689+00:00"
}