`PamHandle::get_user` can cause an authentication bypass
In affected versions, `PamHandle::get_user` can return `Err(PAM_SUCCESS)` after it gets the username successfully. PAM modules that return this "error" code from `sm_authenticate` or `sm_acct_mgmt` early-return a success code to PAM without doing any further verification. This means a user could log in when they shouldn't be able to (e.g., if the module is `sufficient`). The `pam_try!` macro of this crate early-returns the code in this exact way: ```rust fn sm_authenticate(pamh: &mut PamHandle, args: Vec<&CStr>, flags: PamFlag) -> PamResultCode { let user = pam_try!(pamh.get_user(None)); // Can return PAM_SUCCESS here. // If it does, the module does not get to this line. } ``` The root cause is an [incorrect FFI declaration][ffi-decl] for [`pam_get_user(3)`][pam-get-user]. This C function writes a pointer to the username through its `user` argument (of type `const char **user`). This crate's binding declared this argument as a shared reference (`&*mut c_char`). Writing through a shared reference is [undefined behavior][ub-immutable]. Thus, the compiler can assume that the local pointer, whose address is passed as `user`, is still null after the call. After the call, the affected code [returns `Ok`][null-check] only if the return code is `PAM_SUCCESS` *and* this pointer is not null. Otherwise, it returns the return code as an error. If the compiler assumes that the pointer is null, `get_user` returns an error even when the return code is `PAM_SUCCESS`. Release builds have been
- Products
- pam-bindings
- Affected versions
- Not specified
- Fixed versions
- 0.1.2
- CVEs
- Not specified
- Confirmed fixed CVEs
- Not specified
- Updated in this feed
- 1 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC · Revision 1
Source evidence
`PamHandle::get_user` can cause an authentication bypass
core-osv · Original sourcePublished 2 Jun 2025, 12:00 UTC
In affected versions, `PamHandle::get_user` can return `Err(PAM_SUCCESS)` after it gets the username successfully. PAM modules that return this "error" code from `sm_authenticate` or `sm_acct_mgmt` early-return a success code to PAM without doing any further verification. This means a user could log in when they shouldn't be able to (e.g., if the module is `sufficient`). The `pam_try!` macro of this crate early-returns the code in this exact way: ```rust fn sm_authenticate(pamh: &mut PamHandle, args: Vec<&CStr>, flags: PamFlag) -> PamResultCode { let user = pam_try!(pamh.get_user(None)); // Can return PAM_SUCCESS here. // If it does, the module does not get to this line. } ``` The root cause is an [incorrect FFI declaration][ffi-decl] for [`pam_get_user(3)`][pam-get-user]. This C function writes a pointer to the username through its `user` argument (of type `const char **user`). This crate's binding declared this argument as a shared reference (`&*mut c_char`). Writing through a shared reference is [undefined behavior][ub-immutable]. Thus, the compiler can assume that the local pointer, whose address is passed as `user`, is still null after the call. After the call, the affected code [returns `Ok`][null-check] only if the return code is `PAM_SUCCESS` *and* this pointer is not null. Otherwise, it returns the return code as an error. If the compiler assumes that the pointer is null, `get_user` returns an error even when the return code is `PAM_SUCCESS`. Release builds have been
osv:RUSTSEC-2025-0173
pam-bindings
Fixed versions: 0.1.2
Complete source record
{
"id": "1848456ed028a7d2aaa4ccc40dd896abe71ae08abfa625f6ba0993c9be3d2c00",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/RUSTSEC-2025-0173",
"method": "structured",
"payload": {
"kind": "advisory",
"title": "`PamHandle::get_user` can cause an authentication bypass",
"summary": "In affected versions, `PamHandle::get_user` can return `Err(PAM_SUCCESS)` after it gets the username successfully. PAM modules that return this \"error\" code from `sm_authenticate` or `sm_acct_mgmt` early-return a success code to PAM without doing any further verification. This means a user could log in when they shouldn't be able to (e.g., if the module is `sufficient`). The `pam_try!` macro of this crate early-returns the code in this exact way: ```rust fn sm_authenticate(pamh: &mut PamHandle, args: Vec<&CStr>, flags: PamFlag) -> PamResultCode { let user = pam_try!(pamh.get_user(None)); // Can return PAM_SUCCESS here. // If it does, the module does not get to this line. } ``` The root cause is an [incorrect FFI declaration][ffi-decl] for [`pam_get_user(3)`][pam-get-user]. This C function writes a pointer to the username through its `user` argument (of type `const char **user`). This crate's binding declared this argument as a shared reference (`&*mut c_char`). Writing through a shared reference is [undefined behavior][ub-immutable]. Thus, the compiler can assume that the local pointer, whose address is passed as `user`, is still null after the call. After the call, the affected code [returns `Ok`][null-check] only if the return code is `PAM_SUCCESS` *and* this pointer is not null. Otherwise, it returns the return code as an error. If the compiler assumes that the pointer is null, `get_user` returns an error even when the return code is `PAM_SUCCESS`. Release builds have been",
"evidence": "osv:RUSTSEC-2025-0173",
"products": [
{
"name": {
"value": "pam-bindings",
"evidence": "/affected/0/package/name"
},
"prerequisites": [],
"fixed_versions": [
{
"value": "0.1.2",
"evidence": "/affected/0/ranges"
}
],
"affected_versions": []
}
],
"severity": "unknown",
"structured": {
"id": "RUSTSEC-2025-0173",
"aliases": [
"RUSTSEC-2025-0173"
],
"affected": [
{
"ranges": [
{
"type": "SEMVER",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.1.2"
}
]
}
],
"package": {
"name": "pam-bindings",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/pam-bindings",
"ecosystem": "crates.io"
},
"database_specific": {
"cvss": null,
"source": "https://github.com/rustsec/advisory-db/blob/osv/crates/RUSTSEC-2025-0173.json",
"categories": [
"privilege-escalation"
],
"informational": null
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affects": {
"os": [],
"arch": [],
"functions": []
},
"affected_functions": null
}
}
],
"modified": "2026-10-26T14:00:04.237415395Z",
"provider": "osv",
"references": [
"https://crates.io/crates/pam-bindings",
"https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0173.html",
"https://github.com/lvkv/pam-rs/issues/16"
],
"provider_metadata": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
}
},
"related_cves": [],
"security_relevant": true,
"severity_evidence": null
},
"source_id": "core-osv",
"document_id": 454186,
"published_at": "2025-06-02T12:00:00+00:00"
}