LibreChat Shared MCP Server View Leaks Decrypted Admin Secrets
LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.
- Products
- Not specified
- Affected versions
- Not specified
- Fixed versions
- Not specified
- CVEs
- CVE-2026-44653
- Confirmed fixed CVEs
- Not specified
- Updated in this feed
- 4 Nov 2026, 18:30 UTC · Revision 1
Source evidence
LibreChat Shared MCP Server View Leaks Decrypted Admin Secrets
core-osv · Original sourcePublished 2 Jun 2026, 22:40 UTC
LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.
osv:CVE-2026-44653
Complete source record
{
"id": "8ff58baf133c976e040415761215cede0e80a7869e031c770ed7b242b30fd53f",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44653",
"method": "structured",
"payload": {
"kind": "advisory",
"title": "LibreChat Shared MCP Server View Leaks Decrypted Admin Secrets",
"summary": "LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.",
"evidence": "osv:CVE-2026-44653",
"products": [],
"severity": "medium",
"structured": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44653",
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44653",
"GHSA-6vqg-rgpm-qvf9"
],
"metrics": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N"
}
],
"affected": [
{
"ranges": [
{
"repo": "https://github.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat",
"type": "GIT",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0736ff26686e911c9785a237c63a799db1813f0b"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"extracted_events": [
{
"range": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.8.4"
}
],
"source": "AFFECTED_FIELD",
"strategy": "StringRangeExpression"
},
{
"cpe": "cpe:2.3:a:librechat:librechat:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"range": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.8.4"
}
],
"source": "CPE_RANGE"
}
]
}
}
],
"versions": [
"v0.8.4-rc1",
"chart-2.0.1",
"v0.8.3",
"chart-2.0.0",
"v0.8.3-rc2",
"chart-1.9.9",
"v0.8.3-rc1",
"chart-1.9.8",
"v0.8.2",
"chart-1.9.7",
"v0.8.2-rc3",
"chart-1.9.6",
"v0.8.2-rc2",
"chart-1.9.5",
"v0.8.2-rc1",
"v0.8.1",
"chart-1.9.4",
"v0.8.1-rc2",
"chart-1.9.3",
"v0.8.1-rc1",
"chart-1.9.2",
"v0.8.0",
"chart-1.9.1",
"v0.8.0-rc4",
"chart-1.9.0",
"v0.8.0-rc3",
"v0.8.0-rc2",
"v0.8.0-rc1",
"v0.7.9",
"librechat-1.8.9",
"v0.7.9-rc1",
"v0.7.8",
"v0.7.8-rc1",
"v0.7.7",
"v0.7.7-rc1",
"v0.7.6",
"v0.7.6-rc1",
"v0.7.5",
"v0.7.5-rc2",
"v0.7.5-rc1",
"v0.7.4",
"v0.7.4-rc1",
"v0.7.3",
"v0.7.3-rc2",
"v0.7.3-rc",
"v0.7.2",
"v0.7.1",
"v0.7.0",
"v0.6.10",
"v0.6.9",
"v0.6.6",
"v0.6.5",
"v0.6.1",
"v0.6.0",
"v0.5.9",
"v0.5.8",
"v0.5.7",
"v0.5.6",
"v0.5.5",
"v0.5.4",
"v0.5.3",
"v0.5.2",
"v0.5.1",
"v0.5.0",
"v0.4.8",
"v0.4.7",
"v0.4.6",
"v0.4.5",
"v0.4.4",
"v0.4.3",
"v0.4.2",
"v0.4.1",
"v0.4.0",
"v0.3.3",
"v0.3.0",
"v0.2.0",
"v0.1.1",
"v0.1.0",
"v0.0.6",
"v0.0.3",
"v0.0.2",
"v0.0.1"
],
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/cve-osv-conversion/osv-output/CVE-2026-44653.json"
}
}
],
"modified": "2026-10-28T02:30:38.153944891Z",
"provider": "osv",
"references": [
"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/44xxx/CVE-2026-44653.json",
"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-6vqg-rgpm-qvf9",
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44653"
],
"provider_metadata": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-201"
],
"cna_assigner": "GitHub_M",
"osv_generated_from": "https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/44xxx/CVE-2026-44653.json"
}
},
"related_cves": [
{
"value": "CVE-2026-44653",
"evidence": "/id"
}
],
"security_relevant": true,
"severity_evidence": "/severity/0/score"
},
"source_id": "core-osv",
"document_id": 505717,
"published_at": "2026-06-02T22:40:20.672+00:00"
}