OpenReception: GET appointment by ID returns full appointment record without authorization
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.1.0, the GET handler at `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/{appointmentId}` performs no authorization check before returning the appointment record. Any party who knows or obtains a valid appointment UUID receives the full row, including channel and agent IDs, time and timezone, status, and the AES-GCM ciphertext components (`encryptedPayload`, `iv`, `authTag`, `dataKey`). The same file's DELETE handler calls `checkPermission(locals, tenantId, true)` before allowing deletion. The intent is clear: appointment records are tenant-scoped and require authentication to access. The GET handler is missing the equivalent call. The middleware chain (`apiAuthHandle`, `authGuard`) does not compensate: API paths bypass `authGuard` entirely, and `apiAuthHandle` does not block requests to non-admin paths when no token is present. Version 1.1.0 patches the issue.
- Products
- Not specified
- Affected versions
- Not specified
- Fixed versions
- Not specified
- CVEs
- CVE-2026-48077
- Confirmed fixed CVEs
- Not specified
- Updated in this feed
- 4 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC · Revision 1
Source evidence
OpenReception: GET appointment by ID returns full appointment record without authorization
core-osv · Original sourcePublished 6 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.1.0, the GET handler at `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/{appointmentId}` performs no authorization check before returning the appointment record. Any party who knows or obtains a valid appointment UUID receives the full row, including channel and agent IDs, time and timezone, status, and the AES-GCM ciphertext components (`encryptedPayload`, `iv`, `authTag`, `dataKey`). The same file's DELETE handler calls `checkPermission(locals, tenantId, true)` before allowing deletion. The intent is clear: appointment records are tenant-scoped and require authentication to access. The GET handler is missing the equivalent call. The middleware chain (`apiAuthHandle`, `authGuard`) does not compensate: API paths bypass `authGuard` entirely, and `apiAuthHandle` does not block requests to non-admin paths when no token is present. Version 1.1.0 patches the issue.
osv:CVE-2026-48077
Complete source record
{
"id": "068cc6bb86167d891aa7df0f42e69bc780ed39831f172bc076f5f7a115bae0f3",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48077",
"method": "structured",
"payload": {
"kind": "advisory",
"title": "OpenReception: GET appointment by ID returns full appointment record without authorization",
"summary": "OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.1.0, the GET handler at `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/{appointmentId}` performs no authorization check before returning the appointment record. Any party who knows or obtains a valid appointment UUID receives the full row, including channel and agent IDs, time and timezone, status, and the AES-GCM ciphertext components (`encryptedPayload`, `iv`, `authTag`, `dataKey`). The same file's DELETE handler calls `checkPermission(locals, tenantId, true)` before allowing deletion. The intent is clear: appointment records are tenant-scoped and require authentication to access. The GET handler is missing the equivalent call. The middleware chain (`apiAuthHandle`, `authGuard`) does not compensate: API paths bypass `authGuard` entirely, and `apiAuthHandle` does not block requests to non-admin paths when no token is present. Version 1.1.0 patches the issue.",
"evidence": "osv:CVE-2026-48077",
"products": [],
"severity": "medium",
"structured": {
"id": "CVE-2026-48077",
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-48077",
"GHSA-8547-9x2c-9vmf"
],
"metrics": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N"
}
],
"affected": [
{
"ranges": [
{
"repo": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software",
"type": "GIT",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "fc3b106991cce398552474fc6f506fe7ac70578b"
},
{
"fixed": "16474d96c591e246a103b9d6aa15ca30d436d11b"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"extracted_events": [
{
"range": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.1.0"
}
],
"source": "AFFECTED_FIELD",
"strategy": "StringRangeExpression"
},
{
"range": [
{
"fixed": "16474d96c591e246a103b9d6aa15ca30d436d11b"
}
],
"source": "REFERENCES_COMMIT"
}
]
}
}
],
"versions": [
"v1.0.9",
"v1.0.8",
"v1.0.7",
"v1.0.6",
"v1.0.5",
"v1.0.4",
"v1.0.2",
"v1.0.1",
"v1.0.0",
"v1.0.0-rc2",
"v1.0.0-rc"
],
"database_specific": {
"source": "https://storage.googleapis.com/cve-osv-conversion/osv-output/CVE-2026-48077.json"
}
}
],
"modified": "2026-10-28T02:30:36.829166910Z",
"provider": "osv",
"references": [
"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/48xxx/CVE-2026-48077.json",
"https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-8547-9x2c-9vmf",
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48077",
"https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/16474d96c591e246a103b9d6aa15ca30d436d11b"
],
"provider_metadata": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"cna_assigner": "GitHub_M",
"osv_generated_from": "https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/48xxx/CVE-2026-48077.json"
}
},
"related_cves": [
{
"value": "CVE-2026-48077",
"evidence": "/id"
}
],
"security_relevant": true,
"severity_evidence": "/severity/0/score"
},
"source_id": "core-osv",
"document_id": 504351,
"published_at": "2026-08-06T20:47:06.576+00:00"
}